Difference between revisions of "PostgreSQL/From MySQL"

From Jon's Wiki
m (LIMIT syntax)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|  '''MySQL'''  ||  '''PostgreSQL'''  ||  '''Supported by both?'''
 
|  '''MySQL'''  ||  '''PostgreSQL'''  ||  '''Supported by both?'''
 
|-
 
|-
| LIMIT x, y   ||  LIMIT x OFFSET y ||  Yes
+
| LIMIT ''offset'', ''count''   ||  LIMIT ''count'' OFFSET ''offset'' ||  Yes
 
|-
 
|-
 
| BOOLEAN <br /> INT <br /> INT(''n'') <br /> INTEGER(''n'') <br /> TINYINT <br /> TINYINT(''n'') <br /> TINYINTEGER <br /> TINYINTEGER(''n'') <br /> MEDIUMINT <br /> MEDIUMINT(''n'') <br /> MEDIUMINTEGER <br /> MEDIUMINTEGER(''n'') <br /> SMALLINT <br /> SMALLINT(''n'') <br /> SMALLINTEGER <br /> SMALLINTEGER(''n'')  ||  INTEGER  ||  Yes<sup>(1)</sup>
 
| BOOLEAN <br /> INT <br /> INT(''n'') <br /> INTEGER(''n'') <br /> TINYINT <br /> TINYINT(''n'') <br /> TINYINTEGER <br /> TINYINTEGER(''n'') <br /> MEDIUMINT <br /> MEDIUMINT(''n'') <br /> MEDIUMINTEGER <br /> MEDIUMINTEGER(''n'') <br /> SMALLINT <br /> SMALLINT(''n'') <br /> SMALLINTEGER <br /> SMALLINTEGER(''n'')  ||  INTEGER  ||  Yes<sup>(1)</sup>

Revision as of 15:11, 7 February 2008

The following table shows how to get around some MySQL-specific non SQL-92 syntax.

MySQL PostgreSQL Supported by both?
LIMIT offset, count LIMIT count OFFSET offset Yes
BOOLEAN
INT
INT(n)
INTEGER(n)
TINYINT
TINYINT(n)
TINYINTEGER
TINYINTEGER(n)
MEDIUMINT
MEDIUMINT(n)
MEDIUMINTEGER
MEDIUMINTEGER(n)
SMALLINT
SMALLINT(n)
SMALLINTEGER
SMALLINTEGER(n)
INTEGER Yes(1)
BOOLEAN INTEGER CHECK (column IN ('0', '1')) No
INTEGER UNSIGNED INTEGER CHECK (column > -1) No
INTEGER SIGNED INTEGER Yes
INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT SERIAL PRIMARY KEY No(2)
VARCHAR(n)
CHAR(n)
LONGTEXT
BLOB
LONGBLOB
TEXT Yes(3)
DATETIME
DATETIME NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00'
TIMESTAMP
TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
No
'0000-00-00 00:00:00' NOW() No
CHARACTER SET UTF8 COLLATE UTF8_BIN No(4)
column SET('value1', 'value2') column TEXT CHECK (column IN ('value1', 'value2')) No(5)
<columndef> COMMENT comment COMMENT ON COLUMN column IS 'comment' No
[UNIQUE] KEY indexname (column1, column2) CREATE [UNIQUE] INDEX indexname ON tablename (column1, column2) Yes

Notes

  1. PostgreSQL has INT2 (SMALLINT), INT4 (INTEGER) and INT8 (BIGINT), but use INTEGER unless you want ones > 231 in which case use BIGINT.
  2. The SERIAL type is an auto-incrementing INTEGER sequence (implicitly created at CREATE TABLE time), maintained externally from the table (akin to an index). Autoincrementing integers suck in distributed scenarios, consider a UUID or composite key instead.
  3. PostgreSQL couldn't care less, and stores them all as varying text anyway. Insisting on a length won't make it faster or use less disk space.
  4. Create your database with UTF8 encoding.
  5. As of 8.3 one can now go
    CREATE TYPE type AS ENUM ('value1', 'value2')
    column type

Useful magic MySQL incantation:

mysqldump fez_svn_empty -v -n --compatible=ansi,postgresql --complete-insert=TRUE --extended-insert=FALSE --compact --default-character-set=UTF8 -r fez_svn_empty.sql

For now, remove all KEY and FULLTEXT KEY declarations from the above sql file

Importing rows from a MySQL dump that uses INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT for primary keys into a new PostgreSQL database using SERIAL primary keys is problematic. Options include:

  1. reset the PostgreSQL sequences to start from MAX(idcolumn) + 1.
    SELECT MAX(idcolumn) + 1 AS startvalue
    CREATE SEQUENCE newsequence INCREMENT BY 1 MINVALUE 1 NO MAXVALUE START WITH startvalue CACHE 1 NO CYCLE
    ALTER TABLE table ALTER COLUMN idcolumn SET DEFAULT NEXTVAL('newsequence')
  2. edit the dump to remove idcolumn values from the INSERT statements (highly tedious and probably not easily scriptable)