Difference between revisions of "Cosmology Notes"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== Time dilation === | === Time dilation === | ||
Using the antisymmetric temporal part of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_curvature Ricci tensor] to replace the symmetric '''''g''''' tensor in General Relativity, it is possible to derive ''H''₀ = c/R as a general time dilation of approximately 70 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, where R is the Einstein radius of the Universe (approx. 13 Gly).<ref>Jastrzebski, W. J. [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:Gravitation_demystified ''"Gravitation Demystified"''] (unpublished thesis in progress). RationalWiki, 2011.</ref> This would mean that the observed Hubble redshift relation results from time dilation across cosmological distances, rather than the relativistic motion of galaxies in an expanding spacetime. | Using the antisymmetric temporal part of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_curvature Ricci tensor] to replace the symmetric '''''g''''' tensor in General Relativity, it is possible to derive ''H''₀ = c/R as a general time dilation of approximately 70 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, where R is the Einstein radius of the Universe (approx. 13 Gly).<ref>Jastrzebski, W. J. [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:Gravitation_demystified ''"Gravitation Demystified"''] (unpublished thesis in progress). RationalWiki, 2011.</ref> This would mean that the observed Hubble redshift relation results from time dilation across cosmological distances, rather than the relativistic motion of galaxies in an expanding spacetime. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Surface brightness anomaly === | ||
| + | Standard Big Bang cosmology predicts surface brightness (magnitude per unit area) decreases as (z+1)⁻³ yet observations show the surface brightness of galaxies up to z=6 are constant, as expected in normal non-expanding space. Explaining this as galactic evolution results in further difficulties.<ref>Lerner, E. J. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2189123 ''"Evidence for a Non-Expanding Universe: Surface Brightness Data From HUDF"''], AIP Conf. Proc. '''822''' p60-74, March 2006. </ref> | ||
== Plasma physics == | == Plasma physics == | ||
=== Cosmic Background Radiation === | === Cosmic Background Radiation === | ||
| − | CBR as a local radio fog resulting from plasma scattering.<ref>Lerner, E. J. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034600005395 ''"Plasma Model of the Microwave Background"''], Laser and Particle Beams '''6''' p456-469, 1988.</ref> Long tortured history of CBR predictions, unexpected results, adding more free parameters, rinse and repeat. | + | CBR as a local radio fog resulting from plasma scattering.<ref>Lerner, E. J. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034600005395 ''"Plasma Model of the Microwave Background"''], Laser and Particle Beams '''6''' p456-469, 1988.</ref> This also predicts a long radio absorption with distance, which is indeed observed.<ref>Lerner, E. J. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/169167 ''"Radio Absorption by the Intergalactic Medium,"''], ApJ '''361''' p63-68, Septemper 1990.</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | Long tortured history of CBR predictions, unexpected results, adding more free parameters, rinse and repeat. | ||
=== Galactic rotation === | === Galactic rotation === | ||
| − | Computer and laboratory simulations show that at least the ISM (if not the stars themselves) could be rotating as a plasma filament pair constrained by MHD, producing the observed flat rotation profile.<ref>Bostick, W. H., [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1958IAUS....6...87B ''"Experimental Study of Plasmoids"''], Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, Proceedings from IAU Symposium no. 6, ed. Lehnert, B. p87. Cambridge University Press, 1958.</ref><ref>Peratt, A. L.; Green, J. C., [http:// | + | Computer and laboratory simulations show that at least the ISM (if not the stars themselves) could be rotating as a plasma filament pair constrained by MHD, producing the observed flat rotation profile.<ref>Bostick, W. H., [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1958IAUS....6...87B ''"Experimental Study of Plasmoids"''], Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, Proceedings from IAU Symposium no. 6, ed. Lehnert, B. p87. Cambridge University Press, 1958.</ref><ref>Peratt, A. L.; Green, J. C., [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00650210 ''"On the evolution of interacting, magnetized, galactic plasmas"'']. Astrophysics and Space Science '''91''':1 p19-33, March 1983.</ref> These simulations also produce a time progression through the observed galactic spiral and barred spiral morphologies, and may also explain the observed independence of the motions of the stars from that of the spiral arms, if only someone would run the simulations again. However this substitutes ''"we need dark matter to make it work"'' with ''"where does the colossal current driving the filaments come from?"'' |
== Arp's quasars == | == Arp's quasars == | ||
Revision as of 06:22, 31 August 2011
Gravity Theories
Modified Gravity Theory (MOG)
John Moffat (of University of Toronto) proposes the Gravitational constant G is actually a new tensor varying with spacetime such that G/c is constant (Modified Gravity Theory). No dark matter or dark energy. [1]
Expansion as illusion
There are many interesting alternative explanations of the observed Hubble relation of H₀ ≈ 70 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹. The question is whether they raise more problems than they solve.
Tired light hypothesis
The hypothesis that light is red-shifted as it loses energy to the cosmos travelling across vast distances, through some unknown mechanism that does not result in photon scatter. One potential mechanism is the Wolf Effect, where diffuse plasmas can produce a redshift in transmitted light.[2]
Time dilation
Using the antisymmetric temporal part of the Ricci tensor to replace the symmetric g tensor in General Relativity, it is possible to derive H₀ = c/R as a general time dilation of approximately 70 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, where R is the Einstein radius of the Universe (approx. 13 Gly).[3] This would mean that the observed Hubble redshift relation results from time dilation across cosmological distances, rather than the relativistic motion of galaxies in an expanding spacetime.
Surface brightness anomaly
Standard Big Bang cosmology predicts surface brightness (magnitude per unit area) decreases as (z+1)⁻³ yet observations show the surface brightness of galaxies up to z=6 are constant, as expected in normal non-expanding space. Explaining this as galactic evolution results in further difficulties.[4]
Plasma physics
Cosmic Background Radiation
CBR as a local radio fog resulting from plasma scattering.[5] This also predicts a long radio absorption with distance, which is indeed observed.[6]
Long tortured history of CBR predictions, unexpected results, adding more free parameters, rinse and repeat.
Galactic rotation
Computer and laboratory simulations show that at least the ISM (if not the stars themselves) could be rotating as a plasma filament pair constrained by MHD, producing the observed flat rotation profile.[7][8] These simulations also produce a time progression through the observed galactic spiral and barred spiral morphologies, and may also explain the observed independence of the motions of the stars from that of the spiral arms, if only someone would run the simulations again. However this substitutes "we need dark matter to make it work" with "where does the colossal current driving the filaments come from?"
Arp's quasars
Famous for his 1966 Catalog of Peculiar Galaxies. Anomalous redshifts of quasars, and their association with the minor axis of foreground galaxies.
References
- ↑ Moffat, J. W. "Reinventing Gravity". 288p hardcover, 24cm. Smithsonian, 2008.
- ↑ Wolf, E. "Non-cosmological redshifts of spectral lines", Nature 326 p363-365, March 1987.
- ↑ Jastrzebski, W. J. "Gravitation Demystified" (unpublished thesis in progress). RationalWiki, 2011.
- ↑ Lerner, E. J. "Evidence for a Non-Expanding Universe: Surface Brightness Data From HUDF", AIP Conf. Proc. 822 p60-74, March 2006.
- ↑ Lerner, E. J. "Plasma Model of the Microwave Background", Laser and Particle Beams 6 p456-469, 1988.
- ↑ Lerner, E. J. "Radio Absorption by the Intergalactic Medium,", ApJ 361 p63-68, Septemper 1990.
- ↑ Bostick, W. H., "Experimental Study of Plasmoids", Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, Proceedings from IAU Symposium no. 6, ed. Lehnert, B. p87. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
- ↑ Peratt, A. L.; Green, J. C., "On the evolution of interacting, magnetized, galactic plasmas". Astrophysics and Space Science 91:1 p19-33, March 1983.